…Canning the “Age of Entitlement”

 

G'day Petals,

Shane being canned

It's been an interesting few days where the myth of an "Egalitarian Australia" has been well and truly shown to be just that: a myth.

More later in Wombat Droppings.

A new book and some more of the last studio shoot. 

Ballet Theatre Australia's last performance has just been finished and published and a preview can be seen here ...

http://au.blurb.com/books/5067495

Unusually, I had to almost force myself to do the post-process on these shots and was pleasantly surprised at the books outcome.

Book cover

 Alec Bell, an Englishman commented on deviant-art on one of  the "Gille's" studio images with this delightful Hai-ku:  

Standing immobile as the dance whirls around him,

He Dances stillness.

He really caught the intention of the shot.

I hope you who are viewing also enjoy the following.....

Emma

 

Laura

 

Gus and Olivia

 

Gus

 

Olivia

 

Gus 2

Wombat Droppings or Low-Down Politics in Oz

Scott “Drone” Morrison, he of brutal cruelty to refugees, lying and dissimulation to the nation and obnoxious bullying of the press and appalling treatment of Minh Duong made this as his maiden speech in Parliament, 2008: "From my faith I derive the values of loving kindness, justice and righteousness, to act with compassion and kindness, acknowledging our common humanity and to consider the welfare of others; to fight for a fair go for everyone to fulfil their human potential and to remove whatever unjust obstacles stand in their way … Desmond Tutu put it this way: 'We expect Christians … to stand up for the truth, to stand up for justice, to stand on the side of the poor and the hungry, the homeless and the naked, and when that happens, then Christians will be trustworthy believable witnesses.' These are my principles."

Hmmmm... must have walked backward on the road from Damascus. What a hypocrite! 

The lowest levels I expected of this Murdoch mandated rabble has been well and truly exceeded within the first six months of their tenure. "Rabbott the Hun", Joe "Cereal-SPC Killer" Hockey, and Eric"Vichy"Abetz have been proven as liars and have been called such by one of their political colleagues. Whereas the Murdoch dominated media would be frothing at the mouth and maniacally screaming from the rooftops if this had been a Labor gaffe they were utterly quiet, Nine and Ten's News had it briefly as their last items and "The Herald Sun" reported it in a small way on page 2,  two days after the story broke. This is all happening as the ABC is facing a torrent of abuse for its "bias" and... "not supporting the home team...!" 

"Tardis State" ( Where-All-Goes-Backward) pretend Premier Dennis "Inutilus Rusticas" Napthine is bringing in legislation to ban pickets and rallys...which sounds awfully like Fascism to me, whilst the real Premier, the tarnished ex-Liarbril, Geoff"Fiddles" Shaw makes merry with the Liarbrils legislative program.

Do you want to be part of a serious effort to save this planet? Not a serious effort at collective delusion, not a serious effort to feel better, not a serious effort to save you and yours. But an actual strategy to stop the destruction of everything worth loving. If your answer feels as imperative as instinct, then you already know it’s long past time to fight.  www.deepgreenresistance.org

 

..during a severe heat -wave...

Mark Diesendorf: Associate Professor and Deputy Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies at the University of New South Wales, gave this interview  

http:/www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/strategies-for-addressing-climate-change/5239754

In the light of "Rabbott-the-Hun" saying that we are too energy expensive, he and his Non-Environment lackey "Ozone-Hole" Hunt will no doubt not read Diesendorf's book, particularly the part of the research that says Wind and Solar are now cheaper than gas and Coal and that Wind is Britain is half the price of electricity produced by nuclear and that we could have reliable full base load electricity by 2020. This research  makes their position on re-newables utterly stupid and ludicrous.They would prefer the insanity of advice from "The-Coot's-With-Queer-Ideas-from-a-Parallel-Universe" the IPA whose secret backers couldn't care less for the future of the planet, only for their personal profits.

This intellectually lazy and imagination bereft rabble  were well and truly "King-Hit" when the satirists Clarke and Dawe  in one of their 5 minute works, used solely only what "Rabbott-the Hun" had said publicly to make a hysterically funny (but sad) piece of satire. I have never seen anything as pointed. Needless to say the MSM didn't notice as they were busily repeating that "The Age of Entitlement" is over and we have entered "The Age of Personal Responsibility". Read: Code for reverse Robin Hood tactics.

Leigh Sales once again allowed an interview with "Rabbott-the-Hun" into a Liarbril slogan fest... she's turned 7:30 Report into a light-weight puff-piece and is a disgrace.

cheers Possums

Shane.

PS., copies of "The Horst Wessell" song will be available soon... get your orders in quickly as they're sure to go off with a bang...

...on elitism

Vale Robert Hughes.

Hughes was an Australian Art Critic and Historian of superb clarity and breadth of knowledge

Unlike commentators today who seem to think criticism is either a post-modern art form or impolite or both, Hughes wasn’t impressed by bullshit. He said of a wealthy collectors taste and in front of Damien Hirst’s Sculpture “The Virgin Mother”, “Isn’t it a miracle what so much money and so little ability can produce?”

I always enjoyed his writing as it seemed that every sentence contained a concept and sub-text that led you to further understanding the art being discussed. It wasn’t the turgid, self referential gobbledygook that the arts drown in today.

Take this passage from his wonderful book of Australia’s history “The Fatal Shore”…

 Or this from “The Shock of the New”….

 Some say he was cruel, I think he was just bluntly honest and saw art as being too worthwhile, too important, a human activity to bother mincing his words on what he saw as inferior art, “…. otherwise you turn out to be a sort of Pollyanna who wanders the world thinking every sprig of clover is a rose”.

Asked once about being a critic he said, “I’m just the piano player in the whorehouse of art”. And about his so-called elitism, “…I just have a preference for well made things to badly made things and articulate speech to mumbling”.

 Which brings me to a television program that’s been running here for a few weeks on ABC called “Photo Finish”.

Each week a presenter, a photographer (professional and with a different skill set each week) and a gallery curator select three amateur “togs”, give them some gear (some very good gear, advertising for Canon) and let them loose on a specific topic with the goal of producing one uncropped (with minimal photoshop) print at the end of a set time limit, one of which is judged by the panel to be the winner.

Apart from one wag saying it was “Masterchef with a UV filter” and a photographer whose work I admire very much, Judith Crispin ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsien-ku/ ) commenting to me on FB “…it’s amateurism at its worst”, there has or seems to have been no comment/criticism about this program.

Well, last night the topic for the shows contestants was performance photography and by the time the program had limped to its end, I angrily looked at a newspaper that had three well written obituaries on Robert Hughes and thought, “Why have photographers not commented? Surely, they can’t be all that impressed?” I thought, “Hughes would be excoriating about this show.” 

So here goes.

The idea of three amateurs going off to shoot within a time constraint and a specific brief, as a pro does, is a good one often showing how difficult it can be to “bring home the bacon”. Apart from the high–end Canon gear mentioned, there have been plastic cameras, phone cameras and medium format. What seems to be missing is a level of instruction (as many contestants say, “I’ve never used gear like this before”) that allows them a degree of confidence that they are getting their shots without worrying about the camera’s functions. In one episode they were set to do portraits with studio light: perhaps the camera’s were pre-set and light readings had been taken earlier but as presented, it must have been gut churning to cope with a medium format and studio lights whilst having half an hour to grab a portrait of a well known celebrity. I’d be packin’-me-daks!

 The contestants are literally confronted with the judges who almost scream the instructions and the woman curator hardly smiles but frowns her advice whilst seemingly knowing that these people can’t ever produce art that she would like.

The noise levels in this opening sequence are like being in an Australian restaurant, so excitedly high, that you can’t hear someone talk only a metre away.

One contestant was sent to a ballet dress rehearsal and said as her jaw dropped, “There’s so much going on, where do I focus”? But she got into it and enjoyed the challenge but later saying “I think I’ve got the money-shot” was probably not the most appropriate phrase for ballet.

Another, at a dance / acting performance spent more time looking in the back of his camera and moving around so much it was like he was attacking the subject, trying to dominate it rather than letting it evolve and unfold toward him.

The comment “The actors really performed well for me” has that terrifying contemporary ring of  “Mia Primo” of being more important than the thing you’re recording or the people performing.

A constant in performance photography is: 1/ The lighting is set for you: 2/ The costumes are provided too: 3/ The movements are directed or choreographed.

In other words, you don’t get to alter that; you just get to select appropriately.

Some of the judges comments then, were flabbergastingly silly: “You’ve played with the shadows really well” “The lighting, you’ve done so well”(see No.1) or “Pity you didn’t move his hand” (see No.3) or “That detail in the costume helps”(see No.2) and “You’ve captured the cleverness of the performers”, shows either a level of disrespect toward performers or a complete lack of appreciation or misunderstanding of what performers do…. another Mia Primo moment.

This series could have been really good but to me it seems cobbled together: somehow it’s too smart by half.

Cheers petals

Shane